How Marxism is all the rest. Hegel and his Dialectic at play (Explaining the Nazis v/s Communists) and The need to erase history….
Communism – Stalin = Thesis……. Nazism – Hitler = Antithesis Both working in tandem and funded by the ancestors of today’s international banking cartels who funded both sides and made trillions by doing so. It is ultimately they who are behind the (Ordo Ab Chao) chaos we are experiencing today. Which will culminate in – a one world government = Synthesis.
This diabolical plan is known as “The Great Work” and has been secretly carried out by the “elites” and their progeny since well before The French Revolution was set in motion by the Bavarian Illuminati. Who infiltrated secret societies such as the Freemasons in order to go underground after they were outlawed in 1785.
At the core of every despotic regime since it’s inception Marxist theory has been present. Along with a lack of gratitude, and envy, radical Marxism feeds on paranoia.
“And paranoia is very dangerous. Dangerous for both individuals and for nations. Because it gives rise to irrational behavior” – quoted from Philip Short. Author of the book Pol Pot: Anatomy of a Nightmare
The first Communists were quite naive and had a Utopian vision with regard to the application of Marxist Theory. Nietzsche said with regard to Marxist Socialism, “In the doctrine of socialism there is hidden, rather badly, a ‘will to negate life’; the human beings or races that think up such a doctrine must be bungled. Indeed, I should wish that a few great experiments might prove that in a socialist society life negates itself, cuts off its own roots. The earth is large enough and man still sufficiently unexhausted; hence such a practical instruction and demonstratio ad absurdum would not strike me as undesirable, even if it were gained and paid for with a tremendous expenditure of human lives.” – Friedrich Nietzsche from his book “The Will To Power”
To paraphrase, Socialism although an intriguing experiment, would likely result is a massive death toll.
It is amazing how accurate this dire prediction turned out to be.
Every Marxist revolution has dutifully followed the precise steps laid out by Marx. All failed to achieve their goals. And Every single one of them resulted in the deaths of millions. This is another reason that history must first be erased.
“The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.” ― George Orwell
And then the indoctrinated (versus educated) youth must be targeted. As they have no idea as to what Marx-Communism really is. And will thus be seduced by the tropes thereof. Marxism feeds on the envy and ungratefulness of a demoralized, youthful (physically and or intellectually) people who’ve been tricked into believing (by the corporate propagandist media) that their lives and nation are much more worse off than they actually are.
What I find striking about the vast majority of the of these despotic Marx-Communists, was that they were born into wealthy families of privilege. All with the exception of Stalin. Who was most certainly envious of those born into privilege. In them we see utter ingratitude. Born into lives of luxury. These conditions undoubtedly created immense arrogance. And perhaps a bit of envy of those who were truly “in the struggle.”
A Theater of Envy…
Marx-Communism has at it’s core envy. The envy of what someone else has. Versus contentment with what you have. This will be rampant without any type of spiritual fortification. And thus, destroying true religion is a must. Then Marxism can come in to fill the vacuum. While also feeding upon the ignorance created by the void thereof.
Fueled by resentment, deceit, and arrogance, Marxism seeks to punish those who accomplish and or are successful thereby.
“Envy is the tendency to perceive with displeasure the good of others.” – Immanuel Kant
In order to achieve happiness, the envier believes they must acquire that which the person they envy has.
“Our envy of others devours us most of all” – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956
Those who have written about envy, be it Aristotle, Aquinas, Adam Smith, Schopenhauer, or Nietzsche all came to a similar conclusion. Which is that envy is a destructive and diseased state of mind that harms not only the envier (perpetual victim/learned helplessness mentality), but those the envy is directed towards (the media created “oppressors”), and society as a whole.
But today the personal vice of envy has been made into a virtue by politicians.
Attempts to enforce uniformity only serve to exacerbate it. Therefore, those inflicted with envy should work hard to rid themselves of it.
Envy, a “directed emotion”, presupposes the co-existence of two or more people: The envier who experiences the emotion, and the envied who is the target of the emotion. I myself have dealt with being the target of this vile emotion my whole life. Going back to kindergarten.
And a thing I find comical is that the people who direct/project this emotion upon others employ the exact same tactics as the kindergarten bullies did. These people are a “one trick pony” if ever there was one.
A good definition of Envy is found in the 19th century Grimm’s German dictionary: Envy expresses that vindictive and inwardly tormenting frame of mind that is a pleasure with which one perceives the prosperity and advantages of others but grudges them these things and in addition, wishes one were able to destroy or to possess them oneself.
“The indignant person feels anger at the prosperity of those who do not deserve it, and the envious that of everyone” – Aristotle from his work “Rhetoric” 4th Centucy BC
The “Bait and Switch”…
As soon as toppling the existing government structure occurs, Marxists immediately show their true colors by completely changing almost everything they sold the so called proletariat on to get them to join the cause in the first place. As Marxism is always predicated on the “useful idiot” methodology. The term is commonly attributed to Vladimir Lenin.
(In political jargon, a useful idiot is a derogatory term for a person perceived as propagandizing for a cause without fully comprehending the cause’s goals, and who is cynically used by the cause’s leaders. The term was originally used during the Cold War to describe non-communists regarded as susceptible to communist propaganda and manipulation. The term has often been attributed to Vladimir Lenin, but this attribution is unsubstantiated).
In a Marxist subversive takeover, it is those who were employed as the “useful idiots” by the radical Marxists who are the first to be imprisoned and or executed. As it is they who are the most disillusioned after the true nature of the Marxists who used them as pawns is revealed. They also know too much. Therefore they become instant possible “Counter Revolutionaries.”
They are eradicated for being “political prostitutes.” As anyone who would support the destroying of their own nation cannot be trusted. In short, The Revolution Does Not Care About You!
The Marxists are hijacking the black lives movement with their front-group to deflect scrutiny. And as a result hundreds more black people are getting killed. Where are the protests?
Please read on for my ideas about this disturbing trend?
(Interestingly enough, this one radical and obviously infiltrated “front group” shows up every four years right before the presidential election. Then suddenly disappears for the most part right after. Only to return four years later. It is also quite interesting that their stated primary goal is of all things, “getting Trump out of the white house.”
Please bear in mind that I am no fan of Trump, nor any Presidential candidate. As I do not participate in the fraud that is “(s)elections.” Which are merely a “release valve” so that the masses can feel as though they have some sort of control over their lives with regard to the societies they are a part of. All smoke and mirrors within the shadows of “Plato’s Cave.“)
Karl Marx on “Marxism…
In his later years; seeing the obvious flaws and failings of his theories put into practice, he was known to have said “I am not a so-called Marxist” Thus disavowing himself from the radically destructive ideology he himself had spawned.
While decrying capitalism, Marx was at the same time being funded by his extremely wealthy businessman friend Engels. He was born wealthy, and his wife was also independently wealthy. As well as this, he was receiving financial support by the wealthy international banking cartel. The ancestors of the very same bankers funding all the discord and destabilization we’re seeing today.
The Mainstream Media and F.U.D…
F.U.D. (Fear Uncertainty Despair/Doubt) Results in massive paranoia. The most common tools of F.U.D. Inducement in the masses – Propaganda, and Deception.
Repression is also crucial. Whether real or imagined. In some cases such as in Cambodia, the repression was indeed real. In others such as one where the people are socially engineered to believe they are repressed by their corporately controlled mainstream media, the repression is imagined. Joseph Stalin (in)famously said; “Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas.”
Once again, as it can never stated enough, repression a.k.a. “thought policing, is crucial in a despotic, Marx-Communist regime.
Every despotic Marx-Communist regime after the Bolsheviks sought to create a “pure” communist regime. And failed miserably. As psycho/sociopathic delusive sadism blinds one into a state of naive hubris in which one can be a staunch adherent and or student of the communist dictatorships that came before them; yet completely overlook the fact that each one before theirs was a total failure. Please refer back to the previous quote from Orwell about every generation imagining itself to be more clever, etc?
History repeating because each successive Neo-Marxist regime has no historical record of the failings of their beloved ideology in practice. Much like Marx himself, as well as all the despots after him (and perhaps even Hegel), the theory in theory is highly attractive. I myself was once seduced by it until I began to educate myself on the realities thereof. Yet in application, the “synthesis” of the thesis-antithesis-synthesis always collapses upon, and thus devours itself. Much like the Ouroboros. The snake eating it’s own tail. An infinite loops of futility. Death. An Despair.
Unfortunately, the media driven narrative is at the root of all of this. Those still able to employ the powers of critical thinking overstand that just a few months ago, none of this was happening. Thus shining a high powered spotlight on the effects of the “social engineering” tactics being employed on the entire populace of the “civilized” world.
Divide and conquer is the aim. For if the people are fractured by phenotype (race as most call it) socioeconomics, class, creed, religion (or lack thereof), sex, gender, and poli-tricks; all they have left is the state.
This is the perfect breeding ground for Marx-Communists to come in and fill the void.
Which is indeed happening right before our eyes at this very moment.
Media brainwash is a thing. And the majority of the people have allowed themselves to fall prey. Some by allowing themselves to be branded as victims. Others by believing that they have some sort of privilege that they should feel guilty about.
All of this is possible because of the lack of ANY spiritual grounding.
As Marxist takeovers feed on a people devoid of religion. An atheistic society in which the Marxist ideology becomes the new religion.
Yet, only by not being permitted to remain what it initially was, can reality become what is has potential for. The price we pay for our new lives is our old lives. For better, or for worse.
A few final words about a perfect example of F.U.D. inducing media propaganda inspired by one of the most base and pandering examples I have seen in a very long time was the sad sad display of the “Marxist compromised,” formerly brilliant comedian Dave Chappelle acting as a media “mouth piece” for the agenda of the true oppressors in his recent stand up routine. One that I instantly recognized as such. Neither funny, nor brilliant, it sought to pander to and reduce black people to an un-thinking, irrational mob. In it he stooped so low as to resort to kindergarten level name calling, and incited the very types of riots that reduced the formerly prosperous cities of Detroit and Chicago to mere shells of what they once were. All with full knowledge that doing so will force the businesses that employ, along with those that serve the communities their basic goods, to pack up and leave forever. Claiming to “speak for the streets.”
His neurolinguistics laden preaching appeals strictly to the emotions, and not at all to the actual minds of the people he was “pandering” to. Thinking people, please ask yourselves, what at all could ever be accomplished by any of this except for more negative feelings in those who see themselves as victims, and thus more divide and conquer?
Sadly enough, a people so demoralized and subverted with the media’s “victim narrative” would find this type of nonsense rhetoric enticingly attractive. Not knowing that the true power to create positive change for the “black community” lies dormant within us.
What we believe about ourselves has much more influence on our futures than any outside forces. I myself am living proof. A person who overcame overwhelming odds, abject poverty, neglect, and abuse to go onto achieve international acclaim in my career field. Simply because I was raised to take personal responsibility, and to be accountable to myself. In short, because I believed that I could.
These media endorsed people do nothing but create more problems. None of them offer actual solutions. If they really wish to improve the lives of black people, why not organize and fund some of these black militia groups to help them help the de-funded police in the inner cities where more and more black people are getting killed by their Marxist subverted front movements? This is a real solution, and proper targeting of their time and energy. Versus organizing to go protest mountains and rocks. Where is the logic?
“Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious.”
― George Orwell, 1984
What is and is NOT institutional racism (proof?)…
No one born in or after my generation has ever endured the hardships of true Institutional Racism. Despite what the Marxist Media (Matrix) programming would have one to (falsely) believe.
The Jim Crow Laws were institutional racism. As was Separate But Equal, which was abolished in 1964
There is however a very insidious new form of institutionalized racism in the U.S. And thus rapidly infesting the entire Western World. And that is institutionalized racism against white people. Heterosexual white men in general. This cannot be denied.
As there is a saying which goes “If you want to know who controls you, look at who you are not allowed to criticize.”
And at this present time, “the white man” is everyone’s “whipping boy.” Therefore it stands to reason that if the white man was indeed putting everybody down, no one would be allowed to call it out.
Believing in white supremacy is the same as believing in minority inferiority. You cannot have one without the other.
“If you want to keep a secret, you must also hide it from yourself.”
― George Orwell, 1984
Reparations – A tax on people who never owned slaves paid out to people who never were slaves.
Classic victim mentality. Wanting something for nothing is a clear sign that the Marxist media brainwash has it’s hooks deeply embedded in a person’s demoralized psyche. They are clearly suffering from “learned helplessness.”
*(on Voltaire…. in my research, I discovered a disinformation campaign which seeks to lessen the blow this obvious truth can inflict by mis-attributing it to a nut-job pedophile. Don’t believe the hype).
The destruction of the family…
“It is a peculiar fact’ stated Engels a few months after Marx died, ‘that with every great revolutionary movement the question of ‘free love’ comes to the foreground’.’ By the mid- to late-nineteenth century it was clear to advocates and opponents alike that many socialists shared a propensity to reject the institution of the family in favour of ‘free love’, if not in practice, at least as an ideal.” – Richard Weikart “Marx, Engrls, and The Abolition Of The Family”
For Marx, the family represents a microcosm of capitalism. But why didn’t he identify it as a microcosm of socialism to argue that if socialism is feasible at the family level, then it could be feasible at a larger scale? After all, family members do not use prices to convey information to each other about the demands for food, yard work, what vacation to go on, vacuuming, board games, transportation to events, or other things family members do for and with each other. While there are some items and rooms in the house that are used more often by one family member than the others, we do not really have justiciable “private property.”
One of Ludwig von Mises’s most important contributions was to point out that economic calculation is impossible under socialism. Meeting consumer demands requires that factors of production are allocated to the right lines of production in the right quantities at the right time — and that they are combined in the right ways to produce what consumers want and need. Entrepreneurs make these decisions in a market economy, but they are dependent on the prices of factors of production to make their decisions. They must compare these prices to the anticipated prices of the consumer goods to be able to say yes or no to any production plan.
Socialism, however, means that private ownership of the factors of production is abolished, which means there can be no exchange of factors of production. No exchange means no prices, which are vital bits of information for entrepreneurs in a market economy. Whoever is in charge of making production decisions in a socialist regime will be “groping about in the dark” without the use of market prices for the factors of production.
This is why socialist experiments always end in disaster. The death toll for socialist experiments since the USSR is easily beyond 100 million. Resources are wasted instead of used to make food, medicine, shelter, energy, clothing, and other necessities.
Interestingly, another key tenet of socialism, besides abolishing the ownership of the factors of production, is abolishing the family. This is strange because the traditional nuclear family seems like it could be used in producing convincing socialist rhetoric: it is a good example of social bonds without private property, prices, and “capitalist exploitation.”
These ideas on how families survive the economic calculation problem imply that strong, thriving families are ones in which the members know a lot about each other, care a lot about each other, and are unified in their decision-making. Knowledge about each other can only come by many shared experiences and honest communication. Care for each other can be rooted in shared religious beliefs and the duties and affections that come from the shared faith. Unity naturally flows once these are established.– Jonathan Newman “Why Do Socialists Hate Families?”
In short, Family will always be the first line of defense against the state. That is why tyrants aim to destroy the family unit.
This also goes to explain the war of the sexes we see playing out with Radical Man Hating Feminism on one side, and the M.G.T.O.W. (Men Going Their Own Way) Movement on the other. Both untenable, depopulationist extremes.
As Women and Men are stronger together than they are apart. They both compliment one another and keep the human race from going extinct. I say, there is space for all sexes and genders. Binary and Non-Binary alike. Queer, Gay, Bi, Trans, Other, and Straight. To love one does not need to mean that you must hate the others.
For the same sun that shines on one group, shines on them all. Yet the divisive Marxist ideology seeks to divide and conquer. Lastly, one must not forget that Communist regimes are vehemently homo-intolerant. And will not hesitate to suppress, imprison, an even kill non-binary people. Just look at history.
Identity Politics reduces Women, Men, Non-Binaries, and Minorities to “Single Issue Voters” in order to isolate, and control them by appealing to their senses of identity and their fears.
Do not allow them this power over you!
Black Lives Matter ONLY Under Certain Conditions CNN (Communist News Network) and doublethink…..
Recently an interview with CNN’s Don Lemon and Terry Crews, Don said that the BLM movement is not really for all black lives. And the “movement” is only for black lives in relation to “police brutality.” Meaning that BLM is only interested in black lives lost that can further their media driven black victim narrative. And not necessarily “Black Lives.”
So under that logic, why is this self admitted “Marxist political group” (front group) called “Black Lives Matter?” They should by Don’s own (il)logic, be called “Only Black Lives Ended By White Police Matter.”
So he just admitted on international TV that BLM has hijacked the cause of actually helping black people to camouflage their front group that has a stated political agenda that has noting to do with saving black lives.
And as covered in my previous essay, this is a “radical Marxist trained political group” that has gone on record saying that their sole purpose is to “get Trump out of the white house.”
They use “neurolinguistic” hypnotic language to render catchy slogans that seems like something everyone should get behind. And if a person calls them out on their incongruent doublespeak, they attempt to halt the conversation by calling that person a racist. This is child’s play. Easily identifiable if one knows what to look for.
To my beloved fellow black people, BLM is an avowed Marxist movement yet, Karl Marx felt that black people were sub-human. You are being played. Stop allowing yourselves to be pawns in a game you willingly blind yourselves to by adopting the force-fed victim narrative the media (matrix) is gaming you on. The true power is already in the hands of the people, but if you fail to claim it by not recognizing it within yourselves who then, is to blame? I know that self accountability is a bit daunting due to the fact that our collective responsibility falls on us. But our newly freed ancestors leapt at the chance to do so once they finally got it. Many of our ancestors died for it. And honestly, they would be appalled at ANY black person with all the luxuries and opportunities we have today claiming victim-hood.
Signs of social engineering….
Thinking negatively about things that were OK just a few months or years ago. Example.
Pancake mix. The uproar over Aunt Jemima (who is based on a real person) in any time prior to now would have been laughable. In fact, I have friends I have known close to thirty-five years who would have laughed at their current ways of thinking. So what happened? They have been “socially engineered” and or indoctrinated to think what the Marxist subversives want them to think. That’s what. Blind, mute/dumb, un-hearing, un-moving statues you never heard of are now dangerous and must be torn down. This is the new normal. In all it’s abnormal absurdity. The word master bedroom can no longer be used because masters owned slaves. Obvious thought policing right in front of our faces. Attacking the poor Cream of Wheat Man (also a real person), Who looks just like Chef Boyardee. Utter madness!
That is now passing for normalcy. Which is a clear indication of collective self-inflicted insanity. Induced by willingly ingesting the mainstream media (matrix) social engineered force feeding of the Cultural Marxist weapon known as “political correctness.”
First, if we look at it analytically, if we look at it historically, we quickly find out exactly what it is. Political Correctness is cultural Marxism. In simple terms, “thought, idea, and word policing”. It is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. It is an totalitarian ideology that goes all the way back to World War 1.
Indeed, all ideologies are totalitarian because the essence of an ideology is to take some philosophy and say on the basis of this philosophy certain things must be true. When reality contradicts them, reality must be forbidden. It must become forbidden to acknowledge the reality of our history. People must be forced to live a lie, and since people are naturally reluctant to live a lie, they naturally use their ears and eyes to look out and say, “Wait a minute. This isn’t true. I can see it isn’t true,” the power of the state must be put behind the demand to live a lie. That is why ideology invariably creates a totalitarian state.
Second, the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness, like economic Marxism, has a single factor explanation of history. Economic Marxism says that all of history is determined by ownership of means of production. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, says that all history is determined by power, by which groups defined in terms of race, sex, etc., have power over which other groups. Nothing else matters. All literature, indeed, is about that. Everything in the past is about that one thing.
Third, just as in classical economic Marxism certain groups, i.e. workers and peasants, are a priori good, and other groups, i.e., the bourgeoisie and capital owners, are evil. In the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness certain groups are good, other groups are determined automatically to be evil, thereby becoming the equivalent of the bourgeoisie in economic Marxism.
This nonintellectual buffet of “media madness” has resulted in cancel culture. And no one is immune. As what comes around goes around. Today’s cancelers will be tomorrow’s canceled. As the Law of Attraction promises this. The ubiquitous thought policing. Outrage culture. Everyone deleting, unfriending and blocking one another. Triggering. The need for safe spaces.
And on and on into the oblivion of “doublethink”,“political language”, and the “loss of liberty.”
“Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.”
– George Orwell, 1984
“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. ”
– George Orwell
“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”
– George Orwell
6 thoughts on “What is Marxism? And why you should fear it.”
“The thing is, fear can not hurt us anymore than a dream.”
It seems that many didn’t get the memo. And in their fear they will do (and have done) much much damage.
Thank you for taking the time out of your busy day to both read and comment.
A well thought out and insightful read brother Amir. I personally find it notable the consideration you took to write this piece. Carefully analyzing the origins of Marxism and it’s subversive nature into creating a totalitarian godless society of mass-produced persons. I appreciate the extensive time and rigorous effort you share with your audience. I learned more than I have researched on this topic and ties well with what we are witnessing today. God bless brother Amir.
Thank you Sir. I appreciate your appreciation. No good deed goes unpunished though it seems. As there are those who seem to completely miss the point. or are themselves angry Marxists with a vendetta coming out of the woodwork. It is apparent that people like these clearly DO NOT appreciate my efforts and seek to “discredit” me for whatever reason. But the saying goes that “you never catch flak unless you’re flying over the target.” If I am wrong, this is good. That means we have nothing to worry about, however if time and history prove me correct……?
I at least stood up and cried out like Paul Revere while most did nothing. and got ignored and crapped on for my efforts. We shall see how it pans out.
I enjoy reading your blog posts. Although I don’t agree with all your points, I appreciate the rigours research you do to support your arguments. Your writing helps me to clarify and also reconsider my own views. Keep up the good work.
Thank you very much Jonathan. I appreciate you taking the time to read and comment on my work. Of course no two people will ever agree on everything. That said, I am pleased that there are at least a few things in my writings that resonate with you. I am also pleased that my style and form helps you in any way. Be well.